Prime Minister:Good afternoon.
This week, most attention has been focused on Barnaby Joyce and his conduct. There has been a lot of discussion about whether he complied with ministerial standards. Whether he complied with the requirements for disclosing use of government entitlements. Barnaby has given me - as I said in the House - an unequivocal assurance that he has complied with the ministerial standards and with both the use and reporting of ministerial and other entitlements. Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull delivers a press statement at Parliament House in Canberra on Thursday.Photo: Alex Ellinghausen But I think we know that the real issue is the terrible hurt and humiliation that Barnaby by his conduct, has visited on his wife, Natalie and their daughters and indeed, his new partner. Barnaby made a shocking error of judgement in having an affair with a young woman working in his office. In doing so, he has set off a world of woe for those women and appalled all of us. Our hearts go out to them. It has been a dreadful thing for them to go through in the glare of publicity. Marriage break-ups are dreadful, but to do it, to have to experience it in the full glare of the spotlight, is a dreadful business. Now, Barnaby knows he made that shocking error of judgement. He knows that he let down his wife and daughters and he has apologised for that and to them. He is taking leave next week and I have encouraged him to take that leave. I think that he needs that leave. He needs that time to reflect. He needs that time to seek forgiveness and understanding from his wife and girls. He needs to make a new home for his partner and their baby, who is coming in April. But, this raises today, as this has raised this week, some very serious issues about the culture of this place, of this Parliament. There has been a lot of discussion about the Ministerial Code of Conduct. Its a document that was drafted a long time ago and it gets amended from time to time. You will now receive updates from Breaking News Alert Breaking News Alert Get the latest news and updates emailed straight to your inbox. But the truth is that it is deficient. It is truly deficient. It does not speak strongly enough for the values that we all should live, values of respect, respectful workplaces, of workplaces where women are respected. I recognise that respect in workplaces is not entirely a gender issue, of course. But the truth is, as we know, most of the ministers, most of the bosses in this building if you like, are men and there is a gender, a real gender perspective here. I am making today, some changes to the ministerial standards. I want to say that these will not be the last ones I will make. I will be working through this rather old document and making sure that it speaks clearly about the values of respect in workplaces, the values of integrity that Australians expect us to have. Now let me read now the additional words that I am including as of today: This statement is not and cannot be a comprehensive statement of rules. Ministers need to exercise their judgement and their common sense in complying with both the principles and spirit of the standards and their letter. Ministers must recognise that while they are entitled to privacy in personal matters, they occupy positions of great responsibility and public trust. The public have high expectations of them in terms of their personal conduct and decorum. Ministers should be very conscious that their spouses and children sacrifice a great deal so they can carry on their political career. Their families deserve honour and respect. Ministers should also recognise that they must lead by example. Values should be lived. So as you will see, I have today added to these standards a very clear and unequivocal provision: Ministers, regardless of whether they are married or single, must not engage in sexual relations with their staff. Doing so will constitute a breach of the standards. While this new standard is very specific, ministers should be acutely aware of the context in which I am making this change and the need for them always to behave in their personal relations with others. Especially their staff, the staff of other ministers or members of the Australian public service, with integrity and respect. Now, I think we all know that Barnaby's error of judgement, that is the foundation of the woes that have followed, particularly for his family and indeed for his new partner. That error of judgement is something that for a very long time, people in this building and indeed even in the Press Gallery, have regarded as being a personal or a private matter. I have no interest in prying into people's personal or private affairs, at all. I am not here to moralise, but we must recognise that whatever may have been acceptable, or to which a blind eye was turned in the past, today in 2018, it is not acceptable for a minister to have a sexual relationship with somebody who works for them. It is a very bad workplace practice. Everybody knows that no good comes of it. Of course, you know what attitudes in the corporate world and elsewhere are, to this kind of thing. So, it is about time that this change was made. Probably should have been made a long time ago. While I have inherited this ministerial code from other authors and other Prime Ministers, ultimately, it is my signature on it and mine alone. This is the standard that I will hold, from this day forth all of my ministers to. Journalist:Why would you not urge Barnaby Joyce to resign now? Prime Minister:Well Barnaby Joyce is the leader of the National Party, the leader of the party, member of the Coalition. Our Coalition partner. Barnaby has acknowledged his fault, his error, his grief about his conduct. He has to consider his own position obviously. These are matters for Barnaby Joyce to reflect on. He has made a very grave error of judgement, in an area that traditionally I suppose, has been regarded as private and personal and you can understand the reasons for that. Everyone has been anxious - whatever they may have thought about Barnaby's conduct - everyone has been anxious to try to avoid any further hurt or distress to his wife and daughters. I mean, again, this situation is not uncommon. Marriages do break up. People do have affairs with others, of course. But we have to recognise that here in this place, we have such important responsibilities. We don't, in practical terms, have the privacy that many others do. We have to acknowledge that we must have a higher standard. So henceforth, that is why I am making this change. Journalist:It is uncommon to create two new jobs for your girlfriend though, it isnt just a matter of an affair. Why not ask Martin Parkinson to investigate whether there has been any breach of ministerial standards, which you have previously done with other ministers like Sussan Ley and Jamie Briggs? Prime Minister:On the ministerial standards, there have been a number of claims about a breach of ministerial standards made. Barnaby has given me an unequivocal assurance that he had not breached those standards. You can see from the debate in the house today regarding for example, the apartment in Armidale, if he had asked for a gift, that would have been a breach of the ministerial standards. He says he didnt. Apparently the man who provided it to him, says he didn't. Again, those who believe he has breached ministerial standards or want to believe that, should actually make the case for where the breach has occurred. That, bluntly, is the point. Journalist:Greg MaGuire told both me and another journalist Rick Morton at the Australian, that Barnaby Joyce rang him looking for accommodation, so why not just refer it to Martin Parkinson to clear up for certain whether there has been a breach of these standards? Prime Minister:Sharri, I dont want to spend the afternoon talking about this particular matter, the breach of the standard would be if he had gone and asked for a free apartment, right? From what Barnaby has said, he did not do that. He has said that and pointed to examples of Mr MaGuire confirming that. I should also note that he said - Barnaby said and I have no reason to doubt him - that at the time he had a conversation with Mr MaGuire, he was not only not a Minister, but not a Member of Parliament. Journalist:If Mr Joyces actions are so profoundly wrong that they force a rewrite of the ministerial standards, isnt that the most powerful argument that Barnaby Joyce should not be a Minister? Prime Minister:Well, Barnaby is the leader of the National Party, okay? They are our Coalition partners. They have a Coalition Agreement and you all know - every single one of you know - that the standard I have set out today is a big change. You all know and many of you have written it. You have said that these thing is a private matters, personal matters, right? Fair enough. And you know what? I do not want to get into a debate about whether that approach was appropriate in the past or at any time. I'm not interested in an archaeological exercise. I know there are all sorts of stories about former ministers and former leaders and colourful tales that find their way into books. I am saying that from today, this change is being made in a way that is very, very clear. It couldn't be clearer. This is a bright line. I am saying that in these workplaces here, the Minister's offices, Ministers must behave accordingly and they must not - I dont care if they are married or single, I dont care - they must not have sexual relations with their staff. That's it. Journalist:Isnt the fact that you have changed the code such that Barnaby Joyce's actions would now form a breach of the Code, show that you have lost personal confidence in him? Prime Minister: No, it shows that if he did what he did last year, tomorrow or today, he would be in breach of the code. Look, again, let's not kid ourselves. There was a different culture here that had gone on for a long time. I think many women in this building, who work in this building understand very powerfully what I am saying. This is a change I am making from today. You can argue it should have been made years ago, but you cant live your life backwards. The change is being made today. That is the standard I am setting as Prime Minister of Australia, today. Thank you. http://canberratimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/the-full-transcript-from-malcolm-turnbull-s-press-conference-20180215-p4z0ih.html
0 Comments
We all know that it is imperative to hire professional cleaners for your end of lease cleaning if you wish to get your bond back from your landlord. But what we often ignore is the process that should be followed while hiring the right company for the job. Many people just see the price point at which the company is offering to do the job (mostly they have hidden charges which pop up later) and ignore the track record of the company. But my advice is to engage any professional cleaning company only after you are through with its track record and experience in the field. The second most important factor to consider is ......Read more here www.bondcleaningincanberra.com.au/hire-professional-end-lease-cleaners-canberra/
Cape Canaveral, Florida: SpaceX has successfully launched what is now the world's most powerful rocket, a towering behemoth known as the Falcon Heavy that tore through the sky with the thundering force of 18 Boeing 747 jetliners.
Lifting off at 7.45 on Wednesday morning (AEDT) from the same launchpad that sent the crew of Apollo 11 to the moon, the rocket sent up a mountain-sized plume of smoke and a rattling roar across Florida's Space Coast, where thousands gathered to watch. The mission represented the first test of the massive rocket, powered by 27 engines in three first-stage boosters that are essentially strapped together. Play Video Don't Play Up Next Markets welcome German coalition deal Play Video Don't Play Video duration01:44 More World News Videos Previous slide Next slide Elon Musk launches his Tesla into space In a historic first, SpaceXhas launched its long-awaited Falcon Heavy rocket, left an interesting payload in space and landed its two side boosters on land. The maiden flight also marked the first time a privately-financed venture ever attempted to launch a rocket so powerful that it was capable of hoisting a payload out of Earth's orbit. As a promotional stunt, SpaceX founder Elon Musk loaded the Falcon Heavy with his own cherry-red Tesla Roadster carrying a spacesuit-clad mannequin named "Starman" in the driver's seat. Musk said he planned to send the convertible, built by another one of his companies, into an orbit around the sun that would take it near Mars. SpaceX topped off the launch by successfully landing two boosters on land, setting off twin sonic booms on their return. (A third first-stage, the so-called centre core, crash landed at sea.) At SpaceX's headquarters, throngs of employees cheered wildly as the rocket soared out of the atmosphere. "Starman" the mannequin in a red Tesla sports car, launched into space on the first test flight of the SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket. Photo: AP "I'm still trying to absorb everything that happened because it seemed surreal to me," Musk told reporters later. "I had an image of a giant explosion on the pad with a wheel bouncing down the road and the Tesla logo landing somewhere. But fortunately that's not what happened. The mission seemed to have gone as well as possible." If SpaceX can fly the Falcon Heavy reliably, the rocket could prove useful to the Pentagon for lifting national security satellites and to NASA for helping its human exploration goals. SpaceX says the rocket is capable of hauling more mass further than any existing rocket - an estimated 140,000 pounds to low Earth orbit, and nearly 40,000 pounds to Mars. But industry officials say there are some concerns about how big the market is for the Falcon Heavy. SpaceX had been planning to fly a pair of tourists around the moon as early as this year. But on Monday, Musk announced a reversal, saying the Falcon Heavy probably would never fly humans, as the company shifts its focus to its next-generation rocket, known as the "BFR," or "Big Falcon Rocket." Still, the Falcon Heavy's successful launch represents a "revival of the exploring spirit", said John Logsdon, a space historian who is a professor emeritus at George Washington University. The Falcon 9 SpaceX heavy rocket lifts off from pad 39A at the Kennedy Space Centre in Cape Canaveral, Florida.Photo: AP NASA's space shuttle program, which ended in 2011, was limited to what's known as low Earth orbit, where the International Space Station flies at about 400 kilometres above the surface of the earth. But the Falcon Heavy represents a chance to go beyond that, into deep space, to really "push the frontier," Logsdon said. "This really gives us a capability that this country has not had since the last Saturn V flight, which was in 1973." SpaceX's launch comes as the Trump administration is focused on returning to the moon. While it has not released details of its plans or their cost, officials support having NASA partner with commercial companies such as SpaceX, which are striving to make space travel far more affordable than it has been in the past. "It's hard for me to overstate the importance of the launch today," said Lori Garver, a former NASA deputy administrator. "I think this could end up being really the saviour of NASA and deep space exploration." Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, a member of the reconstituted National Space Council, was on hand to view the launch. He lauded SpaceX's efforts in bring back to the United States a large portion of the world market share for launches. And he said that one of the council's top priorities was "how to accelerate the progress of the commercialisation of space. We're moving quite aggressively to try to accomplish that". SpaceX's successful launch raises questions for NASA about how best to proceed. For years, the space agency has been working to develop the Space Launch System, an even more powerful rocket than the Falcon Heavy, but at about $US1 billion per launch, it is many times more expensive. Ross said there was room for both systems. Washington Post http://www.canberratimes.com.au/technology/sci-tech/spacex-successfully-launches-the-worlds-most-powerful-rocket-20180207-h0vno5.html Almost $15 million will be spent on new high-capacity buses for Brisbane, but they will not fit in all of the citys bus stops, will be mainly standing room and wont allow rear-door boarding.
Brisbane City Council announced 20 new high-capacity buses would begin servicing the citys busiest bus routes from the end of January, with each buses costing $736,000. There will be 20 of Brisbane City Council's new super buses on Brisbane roads by September 2018.Photo: Ruth McCosker On Tuesday, the public and active transport committee heard more about the super-size buses and questions were raised about their functionality. It was revealed the buses, at 18 metres long, would not be able to pull into every bus stop in the city. The standard bus is currently 12.5 metres. Shadow transport spokesman Jared Cassidy called for a city-wide audit of bus stops [Bus length] would be an issue if theyre thinking about putting them on non-busway routes, he said. We need an audit of bus stops, particularly on high-capacity routes. Brisbanes current standard bus, a Volvo B7, costs about $445,000, which was about $291,000 cheaper than the new B8 super bus, but the new buses carry about 113 compared to the current 79. The existing buses have 43 seats and 36 standing spaces, while the new buses have 56 seats and standing room for 60. Cr Cassidy said on short trips on the busway he believed the standing room was practical but did not think it was a good idea to have majority standing space on other routes. If were going to get to the point of rolling these buses out to suburban routes it could be a problem for older people, little kids and families, he said. What it means for an overall fleet capacity for any routes that arent on trunk infrastructure busways there will be less seats available in the long run. Cr Cassidy also said the vehicles for the proposed Brisbane Metro would be mainly standing room. The new buses would also have three dual doors spread out along the length of the bus, but passengers would not be allowed to use them to board. Currently, rear boarding is only allowed on the blue and maroon City Glider bus service. Cr Cassidy said he supported rear-door boarding and it was important in the context of the new buses the idea of it was revisited. I support Translink investigating and potentially trialling it on high-capacity routes, particularly ones where there are a lot of people like King George Square, Queen Street and Adelaide Street bus stops, he said. If its an empty bus where everyone is boarding making sense to get them on quicker. I do understand suburban routes where youve got a driver and theyve got a duty of care to keep track and account of who is on the bus and whats happening ... but high-patronage, high capacity routes I think we should look at all-door boarding. Cr Cassidy said anything that got people off the road and onto public transport was good, but the bus stops on high-capacity routes needed to be audited. Public and active transport chairman Adrian Schrinner said about 76 million passenger trips were taken each year and the new buses would provide more options for residents. Brisbane is home to the most modern bus fleet in the country, and we are committed to continuing to improve our services to provide more buses for suburbs and fewer cars on the road, he said. Only one of the new 20 buses has been delivered and is in service, the remaining 19 will be delivered by September 2018. Drivers operating the route will need to do some extra hours of familiarisation training before they can drive the new buses. The high-capacity buses will only service the following routes: 66 Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital to UQ Lakes 111 City to Eight Mile Plains 139 Sunnybank Hills to UQ Lakes 169 Eight Mile Plains to UQ Lakes http://www.canberratimes.com.au/queensland/new-supersized-15-million-bus-fleet-wont-fit-in-bus-stops-20180206-p4yzjl.html First lady Melania Trump recently pulled out of accompanying President Donald Trump on his trip to Davos, Switzerland. Then she travelled to the State of the Union address separately from her husband. Combine those two facts with the still-unresolved controversy over an alleged hush-money payment the president's lawyer made to porn-star Stormy Daniels late in the 2016 election, and plenty of people are drawing their own conclusions.
Luckily for her, Saturday Night Live dispatched some former first ladies who faced their own personal indignities to console her this weekend. Play Video Don't Play Up Next Tourism Australia Dundee Super Bowl Ad 2018 Play Video Don't Play Video duration01:00 More Entertainment News Videos Previous slide Next slide SNL's first ladies A group of ex-first ladies gather to support Melania Trump in one of Saturday Night Live's latest skits. "No first lady has ever been more humiliated than me," Cecily Strong's Trump says during a visit from beyond the grave by Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis (played by the star of the movie Jackie and this week's host, Natalie Portman). SNL brought in the first ladies to support Melania Trump.Photo: Nathanael Cooper Portman's Onassis reassures her by noting rumours of her husband's own infidelity with Marilyn Monroe: "You're not the only first lady whose husband had affairs." Trump responds by comparing the titles of a movie Monroe appeared in (Gentlemen Prefer Blondes) to one that Daniels starred in (which isn't quite suitable for this publication). Natalie Portman reprises her role of Jackie O.Photo: Nathanael Cooper Trump is also visited by Hillary Clinton ("Melania, I feel your pain, but you married him"), Martha Washington and Michelle Obama -- the lone member of the crew who isn't there to commiserate. SNL has pushed the Melania Trump/Stormy Daniels story into the mainstream.Photo: Nathanael Cooper Let's not step on too many more punchlines here -- it's worth a watch -- but it pays to note how SNLcan push storylines into the mainstream. This one is still a little bit difficult for the mainstream media to touch. But as these former first ladies remind us, there are many precedents for all of this. (Well, minus the porn star thing.) http://www.canberratimes.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/saturday-night-live-sends-in-the-first-ladies-to-console-melania-trump-20180205-h0tm7j.html Washington:A Russian man accused of operating a network of infected computers used by cyber criminals has been extradited to the United States from Spain and will make an initial court appearance on Friday, the US Department of Justice said.
U.S. prosecutors said Peter Levashov, 37, ran the Kelihos botnet, a network of more than 100,000 infected devices used by cyber criminals to distribute viruses, ransomware, phishing emails and other spam attacks. Pyotr Levashov, an alleged Russian hacker.Photo: AP Levashov denies the charges in an eight-count indictment handed down by a federal grand jury in Connecticut in April. Levashov, who fought the extradition, told Spain's High Court in September that he had worked for Russian President Vladimir Putin's United Russia party for the last 10 years, Russia's RIA news agency reported. He told the court that investigators in the United States would torture him for information about his political work if he was sent there to face the charges, RIA said. Levashov was charged by US prosecutors with causing intentional damage to a protected computer and wire fraud, which carry a potential prison sentence of up to 52 years if he is convicted at trial. He was arrested while on holiday in Barcelona last April and in October, Spain's High Court granted a US request to extradite him. Levashov was scheduled to appear in court in Bridgeport, Connecticut, the Justice Department said. Reuters http://www.canberratimes.com.au/world/russian-accused-of-hacking-extradited-to-us-from-spain-20180203-p4yzc9.html Dennis Peron, who openly dealt marijuana from a "supermarket" in San Francisco in the 1970s before leading a successful campaign to legalise it for medical use in California two decades later, died lastSaturday at a San Francisco hospital. He was 71.John Entwistlejnr, his spouse, said the cause was respiratory failure.
Peron was identified with marijuana all his adult life.He began smoking it at 17. He continued in Vietnam, where he served in the Air Force, and smuggled two pounds stateside in his duffel bag after his discharge. Dennis Peron (right), leader of the campaign for Proposition 215 and founder of the Cannabis Buyers Club, 1996.Photo: AP "I came back and kissed the ground,"he told Leafly.com, an online cannabis website, in 2014. "I was happy partly because I had two pounds with me. That started a career that would span 40 years." Short, puckish and charismatic, Peron embraced the hippie lifestyle in San Francisco, living in a commune, dealing and smoking marijuana, and opening a restaurant where the second floor was given over to selling it. He was arrested several times; during one bust, at his 11-room supermarket on Castro Street, he was shot in the leg by an undercover police officer. A prison sentence for possessing 200 pounds of marijuana ensued.But it took the AIDS crisis to turn Peron into a political activist. Dennis Peron remembers moments he had with his lover Johnathan West as he holds his photograph, 1996, in San Francisco. Photo: AP He had known for years about the palliative effects of marijuana. He also recognised that pot had allowed him to stay sober after years as an alcoholic. When an earlier lover, Jonathan West, was dying of AIDS, he saw how marijuana eased the nausea and painWest felt from the medications he was taking.One night in January 1990, the police raided their home, arrested Peron and charged him with possessing marijuana with intent to sell. "Now, I've sold marijuana in my life lots of it, but I was not selling that night," Peron wrote, with Entwistle, in his autobiography, Memoirs of Dennis Peron: How a Gay HippyOutlaw Legalized Marijuana in Response to the AIDS Crisis(2012). "There were four ounces of the best marijuana in the world in the house" and they belonged to West.At Peron's trial six months later, West testified that the pot was his, and the charges against Peron were dropped. Two weeks after that, West died and Peron had his cause: to change the laws that criminalised the possession of marijuana for medical use. He joined with other activists to write a ballot initiative,Proposition P, which asked the city of San Francisco to recommend that California add marijuana to its list of approved medicines to treat various illnesses including AIDS, glaucoma, cancer and multiple sclerosis and not penalise doctors who prescribed it. The initiative passed overwhelmingly in 1991; the next year, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution urging the police and the district attorney to make the arrest and prosecution of those growing or possessing pot for medical purposes the "lowest priority." Dennis Peron at the San Francisco Cannabis Cultivators Club, 1997. Photo: Channel Ten While lobbying for statewide medical marijuana legislation, Peron opened the San Francisco Cannabis Buyers' Club, a medical dispensary. Initially intended for AIDS and cancer patients, it soon accepted a broader universe of the seriously ill. "Watching the old supporting the young and the terminally ill counselling the incurably disabled was an increasingly inspirational sidebar," Peron wrote in his autobiography. He added, "The club was more than a place to obtain marijuana; for many it became something of an extended family fulfilling important social and emotional needs." As Californians appeared close to legalising medical marijuana in 1996 through Proposition 215, which Peron helped write, he faced legal obstacles. In August that year, state narcotics agents raided and closed his dispensary, seizing 40 pounds of marijuana; that October, Peron was arrested and indicted in Oakland for criminal conspiracy and possession of marijuana.His supporters criticised the California attorney general, Dan Lungren, an opponent of Proposition 215, calling his actions politically motivated attacks. After the polls closed on Election Day, Peron smoked a fat joint and awaited the results. Proposition 15 easily passed, with more than 5.3 million votes to 4.3 million in opposition. "No person is more responsible for the legalisation of medical marijuana than Dennis," Dale Gieringer, state coordinator of the pro-legalisation organisation California Norml, said in a telephone interview. "He was in the right place, at the right time as a gay rights leader at the time of the AIDS epidemic; he had the right experience as a pot dealer, the gumption to go ahead and do it and the trust of the people of San Francisco, who respected his efforts." Dennis Robert Peron was born in the Bronx on April 8, 1946. His father, Albert, was a computer programmer for Nassau County, New York, and his mother, the former Mary McGrath, was a homemaker.His family moved to Elmont, on Long Island, when he was 10, and he graduated from Sewanhaka High School in nearby Floral Park. After returning from the Air Force, Peron attended the City College of San Francisco on the G.I. Bill while selling marijuana on the side. That eventually became more than a side business. He was victorious on Proposition 215 which he regarded as a legacy of love toWest but a federal judge closed the cannabis club, and others in California, in 1998.Peron found a small measure of revenge against Lungren by challenging him for the 1998 Republican nomination for governor. He finished second to Lungren, with 72,613 votes. Lungren lost the general election to Gray Davis. In 2016, California voters approved Proposition 64,legalisingrecreational marijuana in California.Peronhad campaigned against it, arguing that it would hurt local farmers infavourof big businesses and make it easier to arrest and prosecute people. Reflecting on Proposition 215 in 2016, he told the California newspaperThe Eureka Times-Standard: "In 1996, it was like a dark room had been left for so long without any light. I let a little light in. A light of compassion, hope and empowerment.We empowered the patients and the voters and the people that don't believe marijuana is a crime." Peron never again ran a dispensary; instead, he spent several years growing marijuana on a rented farm in Clear Lake, north of San Francisco, and giving it away to those who needed it for medical purposes."It was easy to shift our resources from the club to the farm," Entwistle said in a telephone interview.They subsequently ran a bed-and-breakfast in San Francisco. Peron's health deteriorated in recent years; he was found to have lung damage from exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam as well as emphysema, lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In addition to Entwistle, Peron is survived by his brothers, Brian and Jeffrey. The New York Times http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/obituaries/gay-hippy-outlaw-legalised-marijuana-in-response-to-the-aids-crisis-20180202-h0skzr.html |
Archives
March 2023
Categories |